🍐 我们总结了澳洲代写中—— 商科代写的经典案例,如果你有任何ePortfolio代写的需要,可以随时联络我们。CoursePear™ From @2009。
任务描述
- 每周你都要根据所介绍的材料以及你从讲座和辅导中所学到的知识写一篇批判性反思。
- 你自己的想法、感受和经验应构成反思的主要内容,转述你如何理解所介绍的材料,以达到个人成长和转变的目的。
- 以结构化和明确的方式批判性地探索自己的价值观、信仰和实践,有利于终身学习,使你得到发展。
- 由于反思性写作是一种正式的学术体裁,重要的是你仍然使用已发表的理论来反思和分析你的经验,并有一个连贯和有凝聚力的书面结构。
- 作品集将由10个反思性条目组成(每个条目约250字)。
- 这种批判性反思将从第2周开始,一直持续到第12周。
标准和评分。
关于这项任务的更多信息,包括实践练习和评分标准,将在课堂上讨论,并发布在我们的课程BB网站上。
Task Description
• Each week you are INDIVIDUALLY required to write a critical reflection based on the material presented and your learnings from the lecture and tutorial.
• Your own thoughts, feelings, and experiences should form the bulk of the reflection, relaying how you understand the material presented, with a goal of personal growth and transformation.
• Critically exploring your own values, beliefs, and practices in a structured and explicit way, facilitates life-long learning and allows you to develop.
• As reflective writing is a formal academic genre, it is important that you still use published theory against which to reflect and analyse your experiences, with a coherent and cohesive written structure.
• The portfolio will be made up of 10 reflective entries (approx. 250 words per entry).
• This critical reflection will commence in week 2 and continue through to week 12.
Criteria & Marking:
Further information about this task, including practical exercises and marking criteria, will be discussed in class and posted to our course BB site.
例文
MGTS2607批判性反思
模块四–澳大利亚雇佣关系中的各方
模块四–澳大利亚就业关系中的各方探讨了就业关系中涉及的众多各方,如国家。该模块还探讨了多元主义、新自由主义、公司主义和马克思主义教条之间的差异。由于技术上的复杂性,辅导班没有在较小的分组讨论室讨论问题,而是由围绕三个问题的小组讨论组成。
讲座和所需的读物提供了对该主题的合理见解。不过,我仍然对某些法律问题感到困惑,如普通法和宪法是如何影响澳大利亚以独特的方式防止和解决与其他国家相比的工业纠纷的。此外,我开始思考2009年《公平工作法》中公平工作委员会是如何规定雇员、雇主和雇员组织在专业工作环境方面的权利和责任的。虽然,这个系统并不完美,但我开始考虑,与其他国家相比,澳大利亚是多么幸运,因为其他国家没有提供基本权利和尊严。
由于问题的性质,小组在一些问题上达成了一致,但不是所有的问题。问题一围绕现代澳大利亚的马克思主义国家理论这一主题引起了辩论。一些学生认为,澳大利亚今天仍然是一个马克思主义国家。考虑到失业津贴,特别是围绕Covid-19的失业津贴,有人争论说澳大利亚是马克思主义国家,由于政府的施舍,工人阶级在整个大流行病中继续发挥作用。归根结底,没有工人阶级,上层阶级将不复存在。因此,资本阶级也需要一个聪明、训练有素、健康的劳动力。通过投资失业救济金,它确保绝大多数人仍然可以工作,这意味着马克思主义的国家理论(Abbot, Mackinno & Fallon’s, 2016)。最初,我认为澳大利亚仍然是一个以新自由主义为主的国家。当资本主义遭遇危机时,如银行债务或我们看到的COVID-19,政府就会进行干预。我的观点与Abbot, Mackinno & Fallon (2016)对新自由主义的定义一致,即政府政策旨在将国有资产私有化,并放松对产品和劳动力市场的管制。现在回想起来,我可能没有完全理解这四种立场中的每一种。回顾我的观点,我发现,尽管社会平等正在改善,但澳大利亚社会的各个部分仍然是一个阶级体系。
反思这次讨论,我了解到澳大利亚的雇员关系仍在不断发展。也许在某些时候,澳大利亚政府会根据情况采取新自由主义和马克思主义的方法?在完成这个模块后,我已经掌握了澳大利亚雇佣关系中不同各方如何运作的基础。我相信我将能够更好地将这些内容应用于我的专业工作生活,并在未来理解更多不同的观点,特别是围绕国家和国际就业事务。
参考文献
Abbott, K., Mackinnon, B. H., Fallon, P. (2016). 了解雇佣关系》。 牛津大学出版社,南墨尔本
Example
MGTS2607 Critical Reflection
Module Four – The Parties in the Employment Relationship in Australia
Module 4 – The Parties in the Employment Relationship in Australia explored the numerous parties involved in the employment relationship such as the state. The module also addressed the differences between pluralism, neo-liberalism, corporatism and Marxism dogmas. Due to technical complications instead of discussing questions in smaller breakout rooms, the tutorial consisted of group discussion surrounding three questions.
The lecture and required readings provided a sound insight into the topic. Though, I was still perplexed by how certain legalities such as common law and constitutional law influenced how Australia prevents and settles industrial disputes in a unique manner in comparison to other countries. Moreover, I began to reflect how the Fair Work Act 2009 Fair Work Commission sets out the rights and responsibilities of employees, employers and employee organisations in relation to professional work environments. Though, the system is not perfect I began to deliberate how lucky Australia is in comparison to other nations who are not provided basic rights and dignity.
Due to the nature of the questions, the group agreed on some, yet not all questions. Question one caused debate surrounding the topic of Marxist theory of state in modern Australia. Several students took the position that Australia is still a Marxist state today. Given the unemployment benefits, particularly surrounding Covid-19 it was debated that Australia is Marxist state whereby the working class continues to function throughout the pandemic due to government handouts. Ultimately, the upper class would cease to exist without the working class. Thereby, capital class also need a intelligent, trained, healthy workforce. Through investing in unemployment benefits it ensures the vast majority of people can still work, implying a Marxist theory of the state (Abbot, Mackinno & Fallon’s, 2016). Initially, I believed Australia was a still predominately a neo-liberalism country. When capitalism experiences crises such as bank debt or as we’ve seen with COVID-19 – government intervenes. My viewpoint was aligning with Abbot, Mackinno & Fallon (2016) definition of neo-liberalism whereby government policies aim at privatising state assets and deregulating both product and labour markets. In retrospect, I may not have fully understood each of the four positions. Looking back on my viewpoint I see how, though social equality is improving, elements of Australian society as still very much a class system.
Reflecting upon this discussion, I learnt that employee relations continue to evolve in Australia. Maybe at times the Australian government takes both a neo-liberalism and Marxist approach depending on the situation? Moving forward from completing this module I have grasped a foundation of how different parties in the employment relationship operate in Australia. I trust I will be able to better apply the content to my professional work life and understand a more diverse range of viewpoints in the future, particularly surrounding both national and international employment affairs.
Bibliography
Abbott, K., Mackinnon, B. H., Fallon, P. (2016). Understanding Employment Relations: Oxford University Press, South Melbourne
CoursePear™提供各类学术服务,Essay代写,Assignment代写,Exam / Quiz助攻,Dissertation / Thesis代写,Problem Set代做等。