🍐 我们总结了心理学代写中，加拿大Psychology论文代写的经典案例，如果你有任何Essay代写的需求，可以随时联系我们，CoursePear™ From @2009。
PSYC 4061 3.0 Section M
THEORETICAL APPROACHES TO COUNSELLING AND PSYCHOTHERAPY Summer S2 Term 2023
RUBRIC TO EVALUATE THE PERSONAL REFLECTION PAPER
Length: 8-10 pages, typed, 1-inch margins, 12-point font, double-spaced pages, not including title page Worth: 30% of final grade
Due date and submitting: August 25th, 2023 by 11:59pm via Turnitin on eClass under subheading “Personal Reflection Paper…” on course homepage. If you have never submitted using Turnitin, instructions can be found here: /assignments-students/submit-turnitin-assignment.
Student learning goal: The field of psychotherapy has increasingly recognized the role and important contribution of the “person” of the therapist in therapeutic outcomes over specific psychotherapy techniques (Wampold, 2001). The best therapists tend not to be “technicians” doling out strategies but have a sense of personhood embodying characteristics (such as e.g., genuineness, openness, acceptance) and practicing therapy in ways that make sense given their character, values, biases, beliefs, preferences, and previous experiences. I want you to build your awareness of these personal aspects about yourself and what approach “suits” you as you have learned different therapy approaches in this course. This will help your future development as a potential therapist and/or helper. Your assignment is to write a paper to answer these three fundamental questions:
1) Reflect on what kind of characteristics you wish to embody as a therapist (i.e., this refers to a sense of “personhood” underneath the therapist and outside of therapy techniques)
2) What kind of approach (or approaches) to therapy best fits you, including how you see clients change, therapist and client roles and core processes in therapy.
3) Most important question: Reflect and elaborate on how your desirable therapist characteristics and preferred therapy approach (or approaches) is influenced or informed by your character, values, biases, beliefs, preferences, and previous experiences.
Please note that you are not being graded on your degree of knowledge of psychotherapy. A weak paper will be one that simply regurgitates course content. A strong paper will be one where you reflect deeply about yourself and open up about who you are and how this relates to what kind of therapist you would be. This is an informal paper that should use the first person (e.g., “I believe…”, “I feel that…”). Paper should still follow APA writing style and this includes making citations where appropriate (i.e., textbook, lecture material). Additional research beyond the textbook and lectures is not required.
A rubric is found below to help you understand what a strong paper entails.
*Please consult the current APA guidelines (7th edition) for details on creating a title page and following APA format in the paper.
*There will be a 5% deduction per day that your paper is handed in after the set deadline.
| Grading | Holistic Description |
| Level 4 | The student reflects on the student learning goal with a high degree of specificity/complexity, thoughtfulness, and sense of openness and personal discovery. In detail, the student discusses desirable therapist characteristics that clearly demonstrate a “sense of personhood” underneath the therapist, and their preferred approach to therapy with specificity and complexity including how they see clients change, therapist and client roles, and core processes in therapy. The paper is not a “regurgitation” of theory but rather reflects a high degree of clarity, thoughtfulness, insightfulness, and sense of openness and personal discovery of how their desirable therapist characteristics and preferred therapy approach have been personally and deeply informed by their character, values, biases, beliefs, preferences, and previous experience. |
| Level 3 | The student reflects on the student learning goal with some degree of specificity/complexity, thoughtfulness, and sense of openness and personal discovery. In some detail, the student discusses desirable therapist characteristics that demonstrate some “sense of personhood” underneath the therapist, and their preferred approach to therapy with some specificity and complexity including how they see clients change, therapist and client roles, and core processes in therapy. The paper is not a “regurgitation” of theory but rather reflects some degree of clarity, thoughtfulness, insightfulness, and sense of openness and personal discovery of how their desirable therapist characteristics and preferred therapy approach have been personally and deeply informed by their character, values, biases, beliefs, preferences, and previous experience. |
| Level 2 | The student reflects on the student learning goal in a fairly superficial, underdeveloped, impersonal and/or theoretical manner. In a generic manner, the student discusses desirable therapist characteristics with little “sense of personhood” underneath the therapist, and their preferred approach to therapy with little specificity and complexity including how they see clients change, therapist and client roles, and core processes in therapy. The paper is closer to a “regurgitation” of theory and lacks clarity, thoughtfulness, insightfulness, and sense of openness and personal discovery of how their desirable therapist characteristics and preferred therapy approach have been personally informed by their character, values, biases, beliefs, preferences, and previous experience. |
| Level 1 | The student reflects on the student learning goal in a superficial, impersonal, and cursory manner or not at all. The student discusses desirable therapist characteristics with no “sense of personhood” underneath the therapist, and their preferred approach to therapy with very little specificity and complexity including how they see clients change, therapist and client roles, and core processes in therapy. The paper is a “regurgitation” of theory and lacks clarity, thoughtfulness, insightfulness, and sense of openness and personal discovery of how their desirable therapist characteristics and preferred therapy approach have been personally informed by their character, values, biases, beliefs, preferences, and previous experience. OR: The student fails to describe desirable therapist characteristics and preferred approach to therapy. OR: The student’s response is off-topic and does not respond to the assignment’s questions. |
| Additional Grading | Technical Description |
- Paper follows APA current style (e.g., title page, citations, page numbers, etc.)
- Paper is in acceptable range (8-10 pages)
• Paper is submitted on time (5% off per day late)
CoursePear™是一家服务全球留学生的专业代写。
—-我们专注提供高质靠谱的美国、加拿大、英国、澳洲、新西兰代写服务。
—-我们专注提供Essay、统计、金融、CS、经济、数学等覆盖100+专业的作业代写服务。
CoursePear™提供各类学术服务，Essay代写，Assignment代写，Exam / Quiz助攻，Dissertation / Thesis代写，Problem Set代做等。